Meta analysis using the most serious outcome reported shows 64% [54‑72%] improvement for the 33 early treatment studies. Results are similar after exclusion based sensitivity analysis and after restriction to peer-reviewed studies. Restricting to the 8 RCTs shows 46% [16‑65%] improvement, and restricting to the 13 mortality results shows 75% [60‑84%] lower mortality.

There is evidence of bias towards publishing negative results. 77% of prospective studies report positive effects, compared to 71% of retrospective studies. Studies from North America are 2.7 times more likely to report negative results than studies from the rest of the world combined, p = 0.0000000264. The probability that an ineffective treatment generated results as positive as the 303 studies is estimated to be 1 in 1 quadrillion.

Washington State Board of Health webpage with links to pertinent rules. Note that rules may not violate session law or constitutional rights and are established by agencies governed by the Administrative Procedures Act.

Chapter 246-101 WAC outlines requirements for reporting information that is necessary for public health officials to protect the public's health by tracking communicable diseases and other conditions

COVID vaccines are “irreversible and potentially permanently damaging,” says Dr. Robert Malone, who explains why 16,000 physicians and medical scientists around the world signed a declaration publicly declaring healthy children should not be vaccinated for COVID-19.

The combination includes diphenhydramine, an antihistamine used for allergy symptoms and lactoferron. Like diphenhydramine, lactoferrin is available without a prescription. In lab tests on human and monkey cells, the combination was particularly potent: Individually, the two compounds each inhibited SARS-CoV-2 virus replication by about 30%. Together, they reduced virus replication by 99%.

The Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine is less effective against the Omicron virus variant than other strains of the virus, the companies said Wednesday, citing interim results from a study they’re running.

Scientists found on average a more than 25-fold reduction in neutralizing antibodies against the Omicron variant compared to the wild type, “indicating that two doses of BNT162b2 may not be sufficient to protect against infection with the Omicron variant,” the companies said in a statement.

Physicians and analysts review vaccine data derived from CDC site, sorting data by time, injury, and batch number to show sequential and systematic variations in toxicity. Evidence produced by adverse effect reports show patterns of deployment, strength of drug toxins, numbers of death/adverse impact alternating with periods of relative harmlessness. Displayed in chart form, implies a non-consentual public experiment to test human tolerance of different vaccine formulations.

Page includes 6 different videos and multiple documents confirming study. Also includes "how-to" video for viewers to obtain and perform their own analysis for proof of concept analysis. Includes comments by Dr. Yaeger, Former Pfizer VP.

the benefits of magnesium chloride for prevention and healing

Dr. Peter A. McCullough, MD, MPH, is a board-certified cardiologist who has testified before committees of the US and Texas Senate regarding the treatment of COVID-19 and management of the ongoing pandemic.

The new omicron variant could increase the likelihood that people will need a fourth coronavirus vaccine dose earlier than expected, executives at pharmaceutical giant Pfizer said Wednesday.

Albert Bourla, Pfizer’s chief executive, had projected that a fourth dose might be needed 12 months after a third shot. But he said on CNBC’s “Squawk Box” that the timeline might need to be moved up. One of the company’s top scientists recently said a fourth shot — possibly one targeting omicron — is likely to be necessary.

A common feature at the weekly Monday morning Board of County Commissioner (BOCC) meetings in these Covid times is a number of public comments aimed at the disconnect between public health policies dictated by local authorities and the data coming from independently-funded, non-mainstream scientific and medical sources. Lately, mandated or coerced medical treatments have frequently been the target.